Mikołaj Bojańczyk

bojan@mimuw.edu.plmore

In the list below, papers are grouped by topic, and links are provided to the most recent versions (i.e. journal preferred over conferences). A complete list of papers with pdfs, chronologically organised based on dblp, is also provided.

**MSO on graphs**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Michal Pilipczuk

*Definability equals recognizability for graphs of bounded treewidth.*LICS, 2016 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Michal Pilipczuk

*Optimizing tree decompositions in MSO.*CoRR, 2017 PDF

In paper [1] (see also the arxiv version and these slides) we show that for every there is an MSO transduction, which inputs a graph of tree width at most , and outputs a tree decomposition of width at most . The transduction is nondeterministic, which means it might output several possible tree decompositions, but at least one. A corollary of this result is that a conjecture of Courcelle is true: for languages of graphs of bounded tree width, definability in MSO is equivalent to recognisability.

In paper [2], accepted to STACS 2017, we show that for every there is an MSO transduction which inputs a width tree decomposition and outputs an optimal width tree decomposition of the same graph. Combining these two results, we see that for every there is an MSO transduction which maps graphs of trewidth to their optimal width tree decompositions.

**Atom book**

This is the current version of a short book about atoms that I am writing. The book begins with a discussion of automata models for infinite alphabets. Then, inspired by these automata, the book develops the theory of orbit finite sets with atoms and computation on them.

**Recognisable Languages over Monads**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Recognisable languages over monads.*CoRR, 2015 PDF

There are regular languages for: finite words, finite trees, infinite words, various kinds of infinite trees, queries, tuples of words, tuples of trees, etc etc. This paper shows that monads, a concept from category theory, can be used to unify some of the theory of “regularity”. The idea is that for each setting, like finite words or labelled countable total orders, or infinite trees with countably many branches, one chooses a monad, and then many definitions and some theorems come out for free. Here are some slides.

**Transducers with origin information**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Transducers with Origin Information.*ICALP (2), 2014 PDF

This paper is about transducers. The idea is to change the semantics of a transducer, by adding information about which positions in the output originate from which positions in the input. Under such semantics, called origin semantics, fewer transducers are equivalent to each other, e.g. the reverse and identity transformations over a one letter alphabet are not equivalent under origin semantics, but they are equivalent under standard semantics. The paper shows that with origin semantics, many technical and combinatorial problems go away. There is also an implicit and debatable philosophical point, which is that origin semantics better reflects the “true essence” of a transducer, because when thinking of a transducer one also typically has in mind some origin information. Here are some slides.

**MSO+U**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*A Bounding Quantifier.*CSL, 2004 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Thomas Colcombet

*Bounds in w-Regularity.*LICS, 2006 PDF

The logic MSO+U is the extension of MSO with the quantifier U, where says that there are arbitrarily large finite sets which make true. The point of the logic is to express boundedness properties like: “a graph has bounded outdegree” or “a sequence of numbers tends to infinity”. When introducing the logic in the first paper above, I thought that it would be decidable. The first signs were promising, e.g. the paper “Bounds in -regularity” showed that counter automata could be used to decide fragments of the logic. Now we know that the full logic is undecidable, but the problems seem to come from quantifying over infinite sets, and weak fragments are decidable. Here are some slides.

**MSO+U is undecidable**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Pawel Parys, Szymon Torunczyk

*The MSO+U theory of (N, <) is undecidable.*CoRR, 2015 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Tomasz Gogacz, Henryk Michalewski, Michal Skrzypczak

*On the Decidability of MSO+U on Infinite Trees.*ICALP (2), 2014 PDF

These papers show that MSO+U (a quantitative extension of MSO) is undecidable. The 2014 paper shows that MSO+U is undecidable over infinite trees, and with an additional set-theoretic assumption called V=L. The 2015 paper (preprint) deprecates the 2014 one by showing undecidability already on infinite words, and not using any set-theoretic assumptions. This group of undecidability results should be contrasted with the decidability results on weak MSO+U.

**Weak MSO+U on infinite words and trees**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Weak MSO with the Unbounding Quantifier.*Theory Comput. Syst., 2011 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Szymon Torunczyk

*Deterministic Automata and Extensions of Weak MSO.*FSTTCS, 2009 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Szymon Torunczyk

*Weak MSO+U over infinite trees.*STACS, 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk

*Weak MSO+U with Path Quantifiers over Infinite Trees.*ICALP (2), 2014 PDF

This group of papers is about the weak fragment of MSO+U. This is a logic where one can quantify over elements, finite sets of elements (hence the name weak), and use the quantifier U, which is used to say that certain sets have unbounded size. Without the weak restriction, i.e. for MSO+U, the logic is undecidable already on infinite words. This undecidability motivates the study of fragments of MSO+U, and the “weak” restriction which allows only quantification over finite sets is one obvious way to go.

**Atoms**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Laurent Braud, Bartek Klin, Slawomir Lasota

*Towards nominal computation.*POPL, 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Szymon Torunczyk

*Imperative Programming in Sets with Atoms.*FSTTCS, 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Thomas Place

*Toward Model Theory with Data Values.*ICALP (2), 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk

*Modelling Infinite Structures with Atoms.*WoLLIC, 2013 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Bartek Klin, Slawomir Lasota, Szymon Torunczyk

*Turing Machines with Atoms.*LICS, 2013 PDF

Atoms are a theory project that we are developing in Warsaw, which even has its blog. I am very slowly writing a book on this, although progress has recently stalled. The project was originally motivated by trying to understand automata on data words and data trees. The idea is to consider sets with ur-elements that are called atoms, and to consider a different notion of finiteness: a set is called *orbit-finite* if it has finitely many elements up to permutations of the atoms.

**Automata with atoms**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Nominal Monoids.*Theory Comput. Syst., 2013 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Bartek Klin, Slawomir Lasota

*Automata theory in nominal sets.*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2014 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Slawomir Lasota

*A Machine-Independent Characterization of Timed Languages.*ICALP (2), 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Luc Segoufin, Szymon Torunczyk

*Verification of database-driven systems via amalgamation.*PODS, 2013 PDF

This is a series of papers on the question: “what is a regular language in sets with atoms?” and as such is a part of the project on sets with atoms. The first paper is about orbit-finite monoids, and it proves a Schützenberger theorem for them, demonstrating that the structural theory of monoids extends rather smoothly to orbit-finite monoids. Paper [2] studies orbit-finite automata, which are more powerful than finite monoids. In a certain sense, orbit-fintie automata are the same thing as register automata of Francez and Kaminski, but the formalism of orbit-finiteness is a bit more flexible, e.g. allowing a Myhill-Nerode theorem and effective minimization. Paper [3] continues the study of the Myhill-Nerode theorem, but it does so for a kind of atoms that correspond to timed automata, where the assumptions of paper [2] are not satisfied. Finally, paper [4] gives a database angle on the automata from [2], although it tries to avoid using the word *atom *in order not to annoy database theorists, including Luc Segoufin.

**Data words**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Claire David, Anca Muscholl, Thomas Schwentick, Luc Segoufin

*Two-variable logic on data words.*ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 2011 PDFHenrik Björklund, Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Shuffle Expressions and Words with Nested Data.*MFCS, 2007 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk

*Automata for Data Words and Data Trees.*RTA, 2010 PDF

A data word is like a word over an infinite alphabet. (A related topic is data trees, discussed here.) The definition used in the papers above is that each position contains a label from a finite set, plus a data value from an infinite set. The data values can only be compared for equality, so a typical property of words is: “there exist two positions which have the same data value and both have label “. (A more general notion of data word is obtained by using atoms, discussed here.) These papers study the automata-logic connection for data words. The problem is that this connection is not so robust as in the case of finite alphabets, and there are lots of different models which achieve different trade-offs between expressivity and decidability. The first two papers are about two variable first-order logic, and the third one is a (slightly dated) survey of the topic.

**Data trees**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Anca Muscholl, Thomas Schwentick, Luc Segoufin

*Two-variable logic on data trees and XML reasoning.*J. ACM, 2009 PDFHenrik Björklund, Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Bounded Depth Data Trees.*ICALP, 2007 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Slawomir Lasota

*An extension of data automata that captures XPath*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2012 PDFVince Bárány, Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Diego Figueira, Pawel Parys

*Decidable classes of documents for XPath.*FSTTCS, 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Filip Murlak, Adam Witkowski

*Containment of Monadic Datalog Programs via Bounded Clique-Width.*ICALP (2), 2015 PDF

These are papers about data trees, which are the tree version of data words, i.e. these are trees where each node has a label from a finite alphabet and a data value from an infinite alphabet, with the provision that data values can only be compared for equality. The motivation behind data trees is that they are supposed to be like XML documents. This is a sequence of papers which tries to tackle the satisfiability problem for various logics over data trees. All of the papers use automata that run over data trees.

**XML algorithms**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Pawel Parys

*XPath evaluation in linear time.*J. ACM, 2011 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Pawel Parys

*Efficient Evaluation of Nondeterministic Automata Using Factorization Forests.*ICALP (1), 2010 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Diego Figueira

*Efficient evaluation for a temporal logic on changing XML documents.*PODS PDF

This is a group of algorithms that work with XML documents in linear or almost linear time. This is in contrast with the XML motivated algorithms on data words and data trees, where typically the running time is exponential or much worse. The first paper shows that XPath can be evaluated in linear time (improving on previous quadratic algorithms), while the second paper tries to explain this phenomenon using automata theory. The last paper considers evolving XML documents. It describes a logic that can express properties like “if a node in the document gets label at some point in time, then at later points in time all of its descendants will have label “. The main contribution is an algorithm that runs in time where is the number of edits, and is a constant that depends (unfortunately, in a nonelementary way) on the formula.

**Algebra for finite trees**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Igor Walukiewicz

*Forest algebras.*Logic and Automata, 2008 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk

*Two-Way Unary Temporal Logic over Trees*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2009 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Luc Segoufin, Howard Straubing

*Piecewise testable tree languages*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Luc Segoufin

*Tree Languages Defined in First-Order Logic with One Quantifier Alternation*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2010 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Howard Straubing, Igor Walukiewicz

*Wreath Products of Forest Algebras, with Applications to Tree Logics*Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2012 PDF

The main motivation for this group of papers is the following decision problem, whose decidability remains open: decide if a given regular language of finite trees can be defined by a formula of first-order logic that uses predicates for the labels and the descendant relation. In other words, the question is about the tree version of the Schützenberger theorem. Since Schützenberger was so successful with monoids, we thought it would be a good idea to introduce something like monoids for trees, which is the topic of paper [1] that introduces *forest algebra*. Unfortunately, we were unable to use these monoids to characterize all of first-order logics, but at least some fragments can be described in terms of structural properties of the underlying forest algebras. A survey of algebras for trees can be found here, it is supposed to appear in an upcoming but much-delayed Handbook of Automata Theory.

**Algebra for infinite trees**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Tomasz Idziaszek

*Algebra for Infinite Forests with an Application to the Temporal Logic EF.*CONCUR, 2009 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Thomas Place

*Regular Languages of Infinite Trees That Are Boolean Combinations of Open Sets.*ICALP (2), 2012 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Tomasz Idziaszek, Michal Skrzypczak

*Regular languages of thin trees.*STACS, 2013 PDF

There are algebras for finite words (monoids or semigroups), infinite words (e.g. ω-semigroups or Wilke semigroups) and finite trees (e.g. clones or forest algebras). What about infinite trees? In [1] we propose a notion of algebra for infinite trees, which is an extension of forest algebra. It is not completely satisfactory (there is no result that finite algebras can be represented in a finite way), but it is good enough to characterize some logics, e.g. the temporal logic EF. The paper [2] continues the study of algebras for infinite trees, by giving a structural characterization of some random logic (namely, Boolean combinations of sets that are open in the Borel topology). The idea is to learn what kind of structural theory of regular tree languages is needed to do nontrivial characterizations. Finally, the last paper [3] shows that most of the technical problems go away when considering thin trees, which are infinite trees with countably many branches.

**Tree-walking automata**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Thomas Colcombet

*Tree-walking automata cannot be determinized.*Theor. Comput. Sci., 2006 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk, Thomas Colcombet

*Tree-Walking Automata Do Not Recognize All Regular Languages.*SIAM J. Comput., 2008 PDFMikołaj Bojańczyk

*Tree-Walking Automata.*LATA, 2008 PDF

A tree-walking automaton is a natural model of automaton for trees. If you would be absolutely fixed on the idea that an automaton must have a single head, then this is the model you would come up with. The idea is that the automaton has a single head, and traverses the tree by going up and down, typically doing something like a depth-first search. This is a series of papers devoted to showing that the model is not well-behaved. The first paper shows they cannot be determinised, the second that they are strictly weaker than the classical model of branching tree automata, and the third is a survey of the topic.

**Finite satisfiability for two-way μ-calculus and guarded fixpoint logic**

Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Two-Way Alternating Automata and Finite Models.*ICALP, 2002 PDFVince Bárány, Mikołaj Bojańczyk

*Finite satisfiability for guarded fixpoint logic.*Inf. Process. Lett., 2012 PDF

The two-way modal μ-calculus is a logic which does not have the finite model property, i.e. some formulas are satisfiable but not satisfiable in any finite model. The same holds for guarded fixpoint logic, a logic introduced by Grädel and Walukiewicz. These two papers show that for both of these logics, one can decide if a given formula has a finite model. For the first paper, about the μ-calculus, the solution boils down to finding trees where certain patterns have bounded size. (Trying to understand this boundedness, I later introduced the logic MSO+U.) For the second paper, about guarded fixpoint logic, one needs to use the first paper plus results on cutting and pasting in models for guarded logics by Bárány, Gottlob and Otto.