Short remarks after checking the project 2nd time:

In general it was much better (practiacally all people corected the raports significantly).


The assessment:
                          Date     Mark    Details

1. Mikolaj Arciszewski    30.11    pass    ok (18/30)
2. Radoslaw Bielecki       4.12    pass    ok (18/30)
3. Jakub Poziemski         4.12    pass    barely passing, no ML and bootstraping 10/30
4. Marlena Osipowicz       4.12    pass    good raport 20/30, I really like it (huge improvement over last html)
5. Igor Filipiuk           5.12    pass    ok 18/20
6. Paulina Knut            4.12    pass    good raport, 20/30
7. Ismail Lachheb          5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
8. Alicja Nowakowska       5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
9. Michal Kukielka         5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
10.Mikolaj Blaz            5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
11.Shadi Darvish Shafighi  5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
12.Rufin Latawiec          5.12    pass    ok (18/20)
13.Stanislaw Massalski     6.12    pass    ok (13/20) -5 points for the delay 
========================================================================
1. Kamil Lopuszanski      28.11    pass    pass in first iteration 30/30
2. Ethan Kang             28.11    pass    pass in first iteration 30/30

Grades:
max 30 (everyone who passed in first iteration, all other max 20)