Jan Wolenski,
ALETHEIA, VERITAS AND TRUTH
FROM PRESOCRATICS TO TARSKI
 

Abstract:
 

   Tarski claimed that his semantic conception of truth conformed, on the one
   hand,the ordinary use of the adjective "true" (or the noun "truth") as
   well as the classical (philosophical) truth-definition, on the other hand.
   This claim was very often criticized . There is no other way to confirm or
   disconfirm Tarski'sclaim than by an analysis of available historical data.
   Aletheia was the main Greek word used for truth. The standard grammatical
   construction consisted in verbum dicendi + aletheia, for example (in
   English translation) "to say truth". Traces of this usage are to be find
   in Homer's poems, and quite explicit form occurs in one of Solon's
   preserved fragments. The earliest fragments with aletheia clearly suggest
   that truth-talk was related to concrete dialogs and situations. Although
   etymology of aletheia, according to the most commonly view, indicates its
   privative character and justifies the translation as "what is non-hidden",
   Heidegger's conclusions (in fact, based only on the one fragment of
   Plato's Republic)are very dubious. Gradually (Parmenides, the Sophists,
   Thucydices) , aletheia became to be used more abstractly. There is no
   doubt that to say truth meant to say how it was or how it is. Plato and
   Aristotle made the decisive step toward accomodating the noted use of
   aletheia to philosophy. In particular, Aristotle's famous truth-definition
   in Metaphysics 1011 preserve the construction with verbum dicendi at the
   beginning and explanation what does it mean to say truth.
   Veritas is Latin translation of aletheia. Thomas Aquinas offered the most
   famous formula for defining truth as adequatio intellectus et rei.
   However, what is very often overlooked, this definition is in Aquinas
   followed by the literal translation of Aristotle's words. Aquinas' formula
   began a spectacular carrier of the understanding of truth as agreement or
   correspondence between thought (propositions, statements, judgments,
   sentence, etc.) and reality. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant and many
   other philosophers freely used the idea of adequatio. Russell supplemented
   this conception by the requirement that correspondence consists in
   structural relation between truth-bearers and facts. Tarski himself was
   rather sceptical about this understanding of truth. He preferred more
   traditional account which was displayed for his by the content of
   T-scheme.
 

Back to list of talks